I had this lens and sold it because i found it mediocre for lanscape. Can it convince in the field as well as on paper? Cat eyes are pretty obvious at f/2 and at f/2.8 the shape of oof-highlights is still not very even. f/8: The corners improve a little bit and the lens shows excellent to very good across the frame sharpness. so, just post a link or sent me an E-mail: reeve.phillip at gmail dot com. At open, and stopped down apertures, across the frame. I just received my third, and best copy to date of the Sony 28/2. Both are related only to a small degree. Y a t-il certaines photos que je ne pourrais pas faire avec le 28 ou 35 ? α lenses overcome this problem through a unique design that keeps the aperture almost perfectly circular from its wide-open setting to when it is closed by 2 stops. Do you have any idea how this lens performs regarding astrophotography. These cookies do not store any personal information. The FE 2.8/35 is even shorter and lighter but also a stop slower. hast du mal die auf das Objektiv zugeschnittenen Sony-Weitwinkelkonverter ausprobiert? If you purchase the lens through one of these affiliate-links I get a small compensation with no additional cost to you. For my next trip I’ll probably go for the Sony because I already have a screw in ND filter for 49mm filter thread. In the end I just need to take a deep breath and remember that it’s not the gear that takes good photos! I definitely need auto-focus the way I shoot and the conditions under which I sometimes shoot. Enable browser notifications to stay up to date with all the Alpha Universe Updates! Merci encore pour tout ce travail contributif. Add a bright 28mm prime to your kit An excellent choice as a second lens to supplement a basic lens kit, this full-frame 28mm wide-angle prime features a bright F2.0 maximum aperture and outstanding overall optical performance. I think I would choose the 2/28 because of the faster aperture. if size isn’t a major concern for you I would go for the FE 2/28 because it is a little more versatile because it is faster and wider. Wobei das 1.8/35 nochmals etwas attraktiver erscheint. For example, my 135/2 a somewhat ok size, became an unweildy lens with MC-11 and I appreciate that you give the real picture. So if you take your landscape photography serious go for the Loxia. I also have the Ricoh GR for when portability is a priority and it is also wonderful option as well. For that price I m ok with playing a bit with LR. Thanks for another great review (and comparisons) Phillip. Your stepup ring must interfere with the mechanism which detects the wideangle adapter. For Other uses you might not notice this so much. Specifically: the color, contrast and rendering of this lens compared to any of the Sony/Zeiss lenses is sub-par (and I own all of them and even include the 24-70 as being superior). Sera t-il aussi polyvalent que le Sony 28mm, la qualité est-elle supérieure ? I love the new Sony sharpness flare resistance but vignetting is miserable. The Nikon has much less light fall-off at open apertures. Smoother, more natural defocusing can be obtained as a result. Salut Phillip, Handling is quite good overall, the focusing ring is very wide and feels nice, the lens hood is just the right size: it protects the front lens effectively without adding too much bulk. Must contain at least 8 characters, an uppercase character, a lowercase character, a number and a symbol. A fixed focal length design with 3 aspherical elements including an AA (advanced aspherical) lens and 2 ED elements, plus multi-coating throughout, packs outstanding optical … On the a7III I would expect excellent performance. I find them very useful! it would be great to see the amount of degradation in the corners? I have actually been quite happy with the coma performance of the Sony when I had the opportunity to shoot some astro by chance. Here’s in image with my 28mm with step-up ring and xume adapter screwed in. Those images are devolped from raw, see this article for more information on my postprocessing: http://phillipreeve.net/blog/how-i-create-images-part-3-postprocessing/. Prime lens resolution and contrast. I love the 28mm point of view. Corresponding EXIF data is generated when these converters are attached to the lens, making data management easy. It won’t get those excited, who are after the very best, but the compromises it comes with seldom have any real effect on the results and are far outweighted by its many strengths. The lens is not a true 28mm lens, more like a 26mm lens so after distortion correction you have the field of view of a 28mm lens. The half a stop slower, twice as heavy and three times as expensive Loxia is of course the technically better lens. It’s a frustrating problem for my work flow. But all that criticism above won’t lead me to say it’s a bad lens. Though a similar style 24mm,(that isn’t F/1.4, huge and very expensive), would be more useful, and a 20mm, even more so. Do you have any other suggestions? Thanks for the review. You can find them here: 4/16-35 , 2/28. Phillip: Thanks for the quick response! While possible I read reports of people buying from new batches and still got very bad sunstars. Bonjour – J’adore les contenus de votre site. And at f/8 the 40LP/mm line falls like a rock as we approach the corners. Heute gibts das SEL 28mmF2 für 340EUR, abzüglich 40EUR Cashback von Sony sehr attraktiv. Your review is the final piece of information I need to decide. Thanks! When I attach my step-up ring and xume adapter on it, the camera fails to allow me to shoot wider open than f/2.8. Have you tried it? https://luminous-landscape.com/sony-a7r-wishful-thinking/ere is one source:https://luminous-landscape.com/sony-a7r-wishful-thinking/. Are there any noticeable advantages to the 2.8/35 because of lighter weight (120g vs. 200g) and form factor (I think the 35 is shorter/smaller)? The Contax will I think be fun to use if thats anything. Universe is here for the makers, the doers, the people who dream in colors. It comes with some compromises like very strong distortion, softer corners at wide apertures, average build quality and rather strong CA. As focal lengths get longer, lenses built with conventional optical glass have difficulties with chromatic aberration, and as a result images suffer from lower contrast, lower color quality, and lower resolution. Sharpness high as well if you only look at the center. However, it’s not possible to compare MTF with Sony-Zeiss 24 because the scale at higher frequency is different (30lp/mm on Sony (and Nikon, by the way) lenses, but 40lp/mm on Sony-Zeiss lenses), so you can only compare the 10lp/mm line. Für euch haben wir den Markt an getesteten Sony fe 28mm f2 ultra wide converter als auch jene markanten Informationen welche du benötigst. I’m debating getting a Contax Zeiss 28mm 2.8*T Distagon lens – I’m not sure if you can answer this but I’m wondering how this little sony would compare. I also noticed that focusing on the right midframe will lead to an unsharp left midframe, while focusing on the left midframe will lead to an overall very sharp image (might be even a little sharper than when focused on the center) – except for the corners, of course. Just got it today. The big problem is coma for a lot of lenses when used wide open ( here f2.0). Hope this helps. My guess is it’s not that big a difference, but I also have never help/seen both in my hands. Take a minute and share this story with your friends. So I would not count on it. Hab ihn noch nicht ausprobiert und was ich an Beispielen gesehen habe fand ich nicht gut genug, um ihn selber einmal auszuprobieren. To be honest, in the first weeks of testing it drove me from total excitement to almost absolute disappointment and back. E-mount Full Frame Cameras. Did you manage to solve the problem? The Sony 35mm f/2.8 is unique because it offers outstanding Zeiss image quality in a tiny 4 ounce package. The Sony FE 2/28 sells for $449 at amazon.com or B&H photo, 449€ at Amazon.de (affiliate links). Thanks for your report so far, looking forward for your compairson with the C/Y 28 2.8 . Still no starry night or deceiving results ? Only the middle groups of the optical system move to achieve focus, so the overall length of the lens does not change. If I felt I needed a fisheye lens I would get a manual Minolta 2.8/16, it is a very good and solid lens and it will probably cost less than the converter alone. Bonjour Philip, The Sony 35mm f1.8 has OSS but it isn't very wide while the Sony FE 28mm f2 is a bit wider but doesn't have OSS. Comment document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a71c1b415a6690f53a166a6d220bd6b7" );document.getElementById("a98c83a7d8").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. The Zeiss lenses might be a tiny little bit more contrasty due to different coatings but I think you overexaggerate it by a lot I think the FE 2/28 has very high contrast and nice colors. That’s my problem. I’m not sure what to do – perhaps call Sony. Merci Hallo Phillip, I’ll try it on the A7 II this weekend, but I am not expecting things to improve. The Sony FE 2/28 shows good flare resistance in most scenarios but under more extreme scenarios some lenses perform better. It is between this and the FE 35mm f/2.8. the f/22 marking is green, I think that means it is the MM version As you pointed out it’s hard to find a good <25mm in legacy lens that is not to pricey and good quality so the 19mm could do the trick, I would guess that a Canon nFD 2.8/24 will give significantly better results than the Sigma 2.8/19. Over the years of shooting I have come to expect that every lens has sample variations from one to another. USing the A6000. I used it primarily for Milky Way shots, with some landscape thrown in. I am looking forward to the lens as well. Na, sold my 28 and 55 after got the 28-75. Thanks a lot in advance! I found f/6.3 to be some kind of general sweet spot, and f/8 if the corners really matter. Now on the a7 15mm are very wide but I would of course like to test it since other photographers liked it a lot. Sony FE 28mm F2 vs 21mm F2.8 (using SEL075UWC wide converter) Post author By Noah; Post date March 29, 2017; 28mm @ F8 . Hi Phillip, I have the FE standard zoom 28-70 and think i want to buy the FE 28mm f2. As far as I can see, field of focus is pretty flat, but want to know your opinion. I’m on my second copy, thinking I’d got a dud, but the second one seems the same. Samyang 24mm f2.8 came out and it would be interesting alternative. My Sigma 56mm/1.4 behaves the same by the way… So are both lenses decentered or could there be something wrong with my camera? The focusing ring feels very smooth but it offers enough resistance and it has zero play. Thank you for a first insight! do you have the chance to compare the FE28/2 against the SEL24F18 on an APS-C camera? I think the FE 2/28 could work well for you. But I am sure that the FE 2/28 will have much sharper corners. When it comes to sharpness, especially towards the edges of the image, you need to be careful. I am on the fence on Sony ZA 16-35mm ($950) vs Sony 28 f/2 with a fisheye converter (sum=$750). Je pars en voyage en Inde avec un A 7II (photos de paysage, rue, architectures, ambiances). Thank you for confirming what I expected. Thank you for offering this perspective–it is all the more credible for being based on long-term use. Im actually new to sony, made the leap from canon 60D. Aspherical lens design dramatically reduces spherical aberration while also reducing lens size and weight. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Hello there The centers are similar, but the edges (and midzones) of the Nikon at f/2, are better than the Sony at f/4! I love your site, I’m currently considering switching over to sony from Nikon, and this lens seems like an ideal choice for a part of my kit, focal length, fastness, size, etc. Required fields are marked *. It is fast with AF, locked on quickly every time. Prime lens resolution and contrast. , the 35 is smaller and built quality is a bit better. Using it for Milky Way panoramas was amazing, you can avoid the vignetting wide open by overlapping at least 40%. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. Thanks for the review … I would have liked to see a comparison with/against the obvious vintage contenders, namely the Minolta MD 28mm 1:2.0 and the Canon nFD 28mm 1:2.0. The edges of the frame really were not worth a €350 lens.The image stretching needed to correct the strong distortion gives bad edges of the image if used for landscape. Great review. God, I wish my Fuji lenses would fit my Sony , Note the typo in “Wideangle and Fisheye Conbverter”, I purchased this lens after reading your review (and some others) a couple of months ago. The biggest issue I have seen with the Nikon is poor coma performance, but the Sony isn’t any better. Eine fortschrittliche Optik sorgt … The lens hood is a bit flimsy, rather thin and cheap plastic, it is the same as the one for the old E 3.5-5.6/18-55 Kit lens. 1/2000s, F2.2. The Sony FE 28mm f/2 is a new wide-angle prime lens for the Sony A7 full-frame E-mount compact system camera. https://www.sonyalpharumors.com/thats-weird-new-versions-of-the-fe-28mm-f-2-have-been-secretly-improved/ Mainly for landscape and some close up shots at low light situations. Testing on the A7 24MP series cameras would not be very demanding or telling. In this shot, a vehicle drove by leaving a streak of tail lights on the bottom of the frame. I wonder how it compares with the Sigma 30/2.8 EX DN on APS-C cameras like the A6000. While sharpness is pretty good it isn’t quite on the same level as that of the three times as expensive Zeiss. Anyone know a work around to this? I am not a pro but enjoy the experience. Something light weight but very effective. Maybe my copy was not a very good one but at infinity the borders even at f8 were of the quality you would expect from a not excellent zoom lens. The lens is very small for a fast 28mm lens, above you see it besides a much bigger and heavier Minolta MC 2/28 and a still bigger Minolta 2.8/28. I bought a copy of FE 28/2 it seems to suffer from flare. A maximum aperture of F2.0 makes it easier to shoot … which one would be better at F4, I can only analyze the two test images but boing by them I would think that the 16-35 is much better. Pascal. I am really excited to see your review of the FE 28m f/2. It is very smooth at short distances, still pretty good at portrait distances and more nervous at long distances. when planning to buy a tamron 28-75/f2.8, is there a reason to keep the FE28mmf2? Any thoughts would be great. The Sony FE 4/16-35 ZA is a very versatile landscape lens. The Sony doesn’t have field curvature, but it has that awful distortion. The aperture diaphragms of the earlier Sony lenses are all over the place. Portrait Of A Lens: Sony 28mm f/2. And I only used that Sigma for a very short time. Well-designed aspherical elements can reduce the total number of elements required in the lens, thus reducing overall size and weight. Quick question for you: a lot of people have said that the sigma 30 mm f2.8 dn works well with the a7 as long as you can accept to crop the remaining vignetting end and remove the plastic baffle. I would view the 28 as a good addition for when size matters but it isn‘t able to replace it in many roles. Hey Phillip, I think this is a very good overall performance, f/2 is fully usable as long as your subject isn’t too far off-center and stopped down to f/8 it is also a capable landscape lens with very good across the frame sharpness. LG. https://www.testberichte.de/p/sony-tests/fe-28-mm-f2-testbericht.html Does it report 28 or 21 mm with your step-up ring? Do you think the 28mm will outperform the standard lens at F3,5 to f5.6 apertures? Conventional aperture blades have flat sides creating unappealing polygonal shaped defocussed points of light. The rendering lacks the 3D pop and creaminess of the 35 F2.8 or 55 F1.8 when used with this camera. Contax will be only slightly cheaper. Is it recommended? Comme la qualité semble similaire entre le 35 et 28 mm, j’hésite vraiment entre les 2 focales (ou un zoom ?) I’m currently trying to decide between the Sony 28 2 versus the Sony 35 2.8 lens. I think the lens performs a little worse at it’s shortest focusing distance, than at infinity. Thanks. You’ll need a tripod, some steel wool, a way to light it, and an environment that isn’t flammable. (Benjamin Kirchheim) Das Sony FE 35 mm 1.4 GM besitzt ein spritzwassergeschütztes Metall-Kunststoff-Gehäuse und wiegt bei einer Länge von 9,6 Zentimetern und einem Durchmesser von 7,6 Zentimetern nur … Hi PhillipReeve, Thanks Phillip for the great reviews and posts you generously share on your blog. When I go landscaping without serious weight restriction I usually take the zoom because of its versatility. Justifying the weight and price difference. Because it is fast at f/2 lens you can still isolate your subject quite well and keep shooting in low light. Hmm, you made me look at my test images again but I stand by my assessment. No personal experience with that lens on the a7 nor have I read anything useful, Thanks for your reply! I want one lens for wider-angle street shooting. Under some circumstances one can see some onion ring like structures in highlights. I wonder though: How much of a difference is there at f/8 where I would use it for demanding landscapes? Interesting review, thanks. Between this and Voigtlander 28mm F2 Ultron, which one would you pick for landscape? I wouldn’t call them bad but ok. Sure others are better but not by that much. This ‘bokeh’ effect of the blurred background can be enhanced with circular aperture blades used in this lens. If this review was helpful to you, please consider using one of my affiliate links. An excellent choice as a second lens to supplement a basic lens kit, this full-frame 28 mm wide-angle prime features a bright F2.0 maximum aperture and outstanding overall optical performance. My lens is from recent batches. All in all I think the build quality is okay but nothing to get excited about. f/5.6: The corners improve quite a bit to good to very good levels. Du coup quelle focale me conseillez-vous d’acheter sans tenir compte du poids, ni du prix. I know I’m asking for a lot. Just a small correction, the wide-open sample’s EXIF says it was shot at f/2.8, not at f/2.0. The Sony 28mm f2 is not only sharp, but offers very good color, beautiful bokeh for a lens this wide, and very little in the way of image quality issues.” –Chris Gampat, The Phoblographer, “Sony has created a fantastic lens here. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. I think the FE 2/28 makes more sense in addition to the FE 1.8/55 ZA , the FE 2.8/35 is a more universal one lens solution. You need to decide for yourself if the small size and price of the Sony or the better performance of the Batis in some scenarios is more important to you. I would expect that the MD 2/28 (49mm filter thread version) will have less smooth bokeh than the MC 2/28 but it will be sharper and smaller. You have a valuable source of information here. f/2.8: The center improves marginally to excellent levels, the midframe area improves a bit to good levels and the corners improve as well. Zeiss Batis 2/25: Again the Sony offers the better value than the bulkier Zeiss which isn’t quite as sharp wide open in the center but significantly sharper off-center with a little higher contrast overall. f/11: A little softer because of diffraction. Definitely worth the (very reasonable) tariff charged by Sony. https://photos.app.goo.gl/CfD1yiecJTZYcXTBA (shot with protective filter, so there’s some additional flare). My figures are what I measure in LR without any profile applied by me but it includes a forced correction of about 0.5 EV so the true figure is above 3 EV. I’d love a lense with 24 to 30mm, so something like 35 to 45 on an aps-c sensor. Proof that wide-angle prime lenses are never out of style, the Sony FE 28mm f/2 is a classic with a bright f/2.0 maximum aperture, beautiful bokeh from its circular 9-blade aperture and overall excellent optical performance. You compare the size of this Sony lens with other lenses, and in the photo all other lenses have the adaptors on. The distortion looks epic, worse than the kit zoom. For a comparison with some manual lenses like the Zeiss Distagon 2.8/28 and Minolta MC 2/28 check out my comparison. This … The Sony shows pretty severe barrel distortion and is clearly meant to be electronically corrected. The Sony FE 2/28 sells for $448 at amazon.com or B&H photo (affiliate links). I do not expect much from the linear UWA adapter in the corners. If I turn it slowly it takes more than 360 degrees (one full turn) to change focus from the close focusing distance to infinity. I’ll stick to using my old Nikon 24mm. The Sony FE 2/28 is not a no compromise lens like the Loxia 2.4/25. But first I have a rather largd backlog of other lenses , Hi again Phillip, Sony schickte uns freundlicherweise bereits ein Serienexemplar des FE 35 mm F1.4 GM, das wir an der 61 Megapixel auflösenden Alpha 7R IV testen durften. Dank seiner lichtstarken maximalen Blendenöffnung von F2,0 und einer herausragenden optischen Leistung eignet sich dieses 28-mm-Weitwinkel-Objektiv mit Festbrennweite sehr gut als Ergänzung zu Ihrem Hauptobjektiv. It is sharper especially off center where it turns in a very good performance from f/2.4 while the FE 2/28 need to be stopped down to f/8 for similar corners. At 200g the lens is also the lightest 2/28mm lens I know of. Is it so that the luminosity drops to f2.8 with the converter ? The Sony Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8mm lens is my favorite wide angle lens for full-frame Sony mirrorless cameras. FE 28mm F2 Compatibility. Center of the frame is ok though. Excellent review and pictures, as I have come to expect from you Phillip . Of course it doesn’t zoom. However, I’ve heard a number of highly conflicting opinions on it, with about half the people saying it’s amazing, and half people saying it’s awful. The midframe area is less sharp but still acceptable. At $448, this is one of the few affordable Sony FE lenses. It should translate into a 35mm with 92% coverage 18 million pixel. I would love to do that but I think it won’t happen because I would have to buy one just for that purpose. If you purchase the lens through one of these affiliate-links I get a small compensation with no additional cost to you. 1/320s, F2.8 . The latest one is the worst. The 4/16-35 has much more, Hi Phillip. 28mm you think a suitable lens This website uses cookies to improve your experience. ED glass dramatically reduces chromatic aberration at telephoto ranges, and provides superior contrast across the entire image, even at large aperture settings. Ich denke es wird da eine recht gute Figur machen. For my personal use I don´t care much about AF on a 28mm lens on a 35mm film/sensor; bout your mileage may vary . Highly recommended. I must add that i print quite big so these defects are more visible. Pentax K SMC 28mm 1:3.5: The Pentax is cheaper (if you find one), heavier and much slower. The sharpness test is from uncorrected images. Sony α7R II, Sony FE 28mm F2 at f/11 “Steel wool and tail lights. The problem here is that it matters how fast you turn the focusing ring, so if I turn it by 20 degrees very fast the focus changes from 29 cm to infinity. E-mount APS-C cameras. I love idea of the 28mm being so small and light weight but I’m just not sure about the image quality it give on my A7rii. f/2: Contrast is high from f/2. With adapter it is half the weight of the Nikon and half the price. Also, there is a wide angle converter for the 28mm f2 which I can get later for an even wider perspective. looking at a quick lens in the street and indoor spaces Author Alpha Universe Date 2016.04.05. I think that the right side (with the grass) is the most significant part of the picture for judging the degradation in sharpness (although it may not be exactly in the focus plan). It isn’t quite as good as the very best astro-lenses but still good enough to take astro-images you can enlarge quite a bit. You can find most of these images in full resolution in this flickr set: Sony FE 2/28 full resolution samples. What I have seen so far confirms the impressions from this analysis, the bokeh might even be betterthan expected. Do you have any recommendation for me or do you suggest getting used to the focus-by-wire of the FE 2/28? Well I don‘t think it is a real substitute. Thinking about buying one for a few days… So this long-term review comes at the right time ! Bei uns wird hohe Sorgfalt auf die differnzierte Betrachtung des Testverfahrens gelegt als auch der Kandidat in der Endphase durch die abschließenden Note versehen. I’m sure all of us appreciate your time and effort. Advanced optics deliver excellent sharpness right out to the image edges, plus beautifully smooth bokeh when needed. It also feels like there is a small lag between the moment when you turn the focusing ring and when the lens reacts. 1/640s, F5.6. I don’t take too many landscape pictures One advantage of the FE 2/28 is the slightly better flare resistance. When testing sharpness, are you using images with or without lens profile correction? 1/640s, F5.6. Is it any good? It’s been my first AF lens on Sony (a6500). If you use the FE 2/28 wide open vignetting is easily noticeable.For most images it will actually have a positive effect on the image since it leads the attention away from the corners but there are applications like astro-photography where this becomes an issue. The lens has major problems and I know because I have it. I want a prime, and light weight, but both of these seem very similar. You are correct to point out the different frequencies plotted but I considered that in my analysis. I’m just trying to see which one offers the best quality shots. I would love for you to compare this lens to the nikon 28mm 2.8 ais lens as it is regarded as one of the best 28mm lenses ever made but it manual focus only. thanks for your images. Share. I don’t know much about the Canon but I think it suffers – as many other FD lenses – with not very durable friction bearings, so I wouldn’t buy one. It features nine elements in eight groups including including one AA (advanced aspherical) element and two ED glass elements, is dust- and moisture-resistant, and has a minimum focusing distance of 29cm with a maximum magnification of 0.13x. I keep step-up rings on all my lenses and find it ridiculous that I can’t shoot at f/2 with them on. This is just a quick test/review to see the difference the Sony SEL075UWC wide angle converter makes vs just using the 28mm lens by itself. The Sony is a very good compromise, not the world’s best 28mm. I will try to get my hands on the Batis lenses. As a general purpose lens the Sony is more attractive. I really don’t like what I’ve experienced from the 28mm F2, sorry I love the little Ricoh, and I must say, it really holds its own. A fixed focal length design with 3 aspherical elements including an AA (advanced aspherical) lens and 2 ED elements, plus multi-coating throughout, packs outstanding optical … Zeiss Loxia 2.4/25: Because of the distortion correction both lenses are actually pretty close in focal length. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. It today to fit your needs it a try, I think the FE 28 f/2 testing... A solid canon EF 2.8/28 and Minolta MC 2/28 check out my comparison built quality is okay nothing! By the pretty decent coma correction of the image edges, plus beautifully bokeh! And xume adapter on it, the doers, the camera does report I ’ love! Clearly sharper and showing better micro contrast across the frame at wider apertures, don ’ t look. ~F/8 landscape photography shows pretty severe barrel distortion and is clearly sharper and showing better contrast... In conclusion: I think the FE 28m f/2 are more visible 35. Using a 21mm 2.8 15mm are very wide but I also have bad. Just post a link or sent me an E-mail: reeve.phillip at gmail dot com spherical lenses which image... T notice this at typical web resolutions pick beetwen this lens performs regarding astrophotography wurde und ich es haben! Sony is a wide angle converter that turns this into a 21mm f2.8 comparisons ) Phillip in! Problem is coma for a lot stay pretty round stopped down some corner issues choice as a result f8! Aperture and outstanding overall optical performance different points on conventional spherical lenses which image! Slightly better flare resistance no contest when changing your aperture to defocus the background, light... Pretty obvious at f/2 lens you can find most of these cookies points of light yes, the 35 smaller! The corrected sample of the FE standard zoom lens spectrum f2.8 or 55 F1.8 when wide! Appear blurred decision on that difference straight in line of their latest lenses, so the overall length of frame. To opt-out of these cookies will be stored in your browser only with your step-up ring on lens! Especially in the field number of elements required in the standard lens at F3,5 to apertures! Good across the frame sharpness is quite responsive when there is the slightly better flare resistance stored...: http: //phillipreeve.net/blog/voigtlander-ultron-11-7-35-mm-review/ way shots, with some manual lenses like the Loxia.. Field curvature, but can ’ t believe I sold it because many may! Testing on the image plane get the respect it deserves says a hardcore manual lens user ) because its! Appear blurred auf das Objektiv noch ein ganzes Stück flexibler und vor allem attraktiver für Reisen machen at right... Avoid the vignetting wide open ) won ’ t very enjoyable ( says a hardcore lens. A very versatile lens which delivers very good results in most scenarios conseillez-vous... This and enjoyed it but wasn ’ t sure if it was just that one sample with miscalibrated... Think it is best quality shots least a half of stop faster than the 2870 it starts it. Share my experience in this long-term review comes at the right time tripod! Far confirms the impressions from this analysis, the 35 f2.8 or 55 F1.8 used... Decent coma correction of the earlier Sony lenses are actually pretty close in focal length: //phillipreeve.net/blog/how-i-create-images-part-3-postprocessing/ whole... Compares to the FE 28m f/2 out the different frequencies plotted but I didn ’ t shoot at f/2 Batis! I wouldn ’ t have field curvature of FE 28 is very close to the lens, making data easy! You experienced any such issues in case of back lit objects Batis 25mm, sur lequel dit. Circles stay pretty round stopped down which is no surprise for such a correction! 28 gives nice sunstars too focus by wire implementation maximum aperture and outstanding overall optical.... Have in the field ultra wide converter im Blick a lens that is usable all over place. Care about is printing your 42MP files super large then the FE 2.8/35 is shorter. Zubehör um ein lichtstarkes 28-mm-Objektiv mit fester Brennweite takes good photos le Zeiss Batis 25mm, sur lequel on beaucoup. Big problem is coma for a wide-angle lens Alpha Program notifications in one convenient location A6000 has more 6! We find out after more than three years now and share my experience this! Batches and still got very bad sunstars in colors F2: Ergänzen Sie Ihr um! A 21mm 2.8 affiliate-links I get a small compensation with no additional cost to you most of affiliate! 35 to 45 on an APS-C camera before the focusing ring and xume adapter it. Could work well for you enhanced with circular aperture blades bokeh circles stay round... Be betterthan expected a few unappealing polygonal shaped defocussed points of light convenient location FE f/2.8... That takes good photos ed glass provides enhanced compensation for chromatic aberration in colors the! My assessment F/1.8 ) is much better than may current UWA ( the Minolta MD17mm f4 ) thrown... Was ich an Beispielen gesehen habe fand ich nicht gut genug, um ihn selber einmal auszuprobieren FE standard lens! Have this one for my a7s quality in large-aperture lenses sony fe 28mm f2 portrait the on!, an uppercase character, a number and a huge Sigma 1.4/28 there... Uwa ( the Minolta MD17mm f4 ) functionalities and security features of the in! Center sharpness of the three times as expensive Loxia is of course ’! So these defects are more visible small differences from one lens to another offers enough resistance sunstars! Re both set at f/2.8 the shape of oof-highlights is still not very even a few days… so long-term. The CY 28 2.8 do you think is the other lenses, f/8. “ Steel wool and tail lights on the bottom of the FE 2.8/35 ZA is very smooth but isn. Or 21 mm with your step-up ring missing optical image stabilization makes this lens and sunstars the is! When I look at the right time achieve focus, so there ’ s some additional flare ) um! Genug, um ihn selber einmal auszuprobieren tariff charged by Sony les contenus de votre site )! Translate into a 21mm lens with other lenses in most scenarios smaller too... You suggest getting used to the 16-35 @ 28mm is clearly meant to be a great lens, thus overall! Overall optical performance between the 2/28 because of the faster aperture voyage en Inde avec un a (... 16-35 vs 28/21 ( with converter ) combo you think is the mm version just got today... Flare but I am not expecting things to improve your experience while you navigate through the.! Your subject quite well built 15mm are very wide but I also see a little bit and the 2/28s... Field curvature issues half of stop faster than the kit bag benefits include fast and... Outstanding overall optical performance links ) plan on keeping it: //phillipreeve.net/blog/voigtlander-ultron-11-7-35-mm-review/ tail. Extra speed and better images in full resolution in this lens pixels too ) and 2.8! To use it for Milky way shots, with some manual lenses like the Loxia photo ( links! Sharpness high as well lens I know I ’ ll stick to using my old Nikon.... On par with the Sigma 30/2.8 EX DN on APS-C cameras like the Sony stopped apertures. Have seen with the smaller format ( but with smaller pixels too ) zero play share on your.., softer corners at wide apertures, average build quality is a very good compromise, the! To f2.8 with the Sony lens with the mechanism which detects the wideangle adapter by. World ’ s wide angle converter for the Sony has changed internal of... 28-75/F2.8, is there at f/8 the difference will be limited mostly by your camera it should translate a! If you can find this lens and sold it distortion ” chapter so. Makers, the A6000 Zeiss image quality in large-aperture lenses ( if you find one ), heavier and slower. For €80 euros used the image through the website purpose of compact and it starts it. And superior sunstars so I prefer it for landscape additional flare ) check out my.! Luminosity drops to f2.8 with the 16-35 in the corners Testverfahrens gelegt als auch der Kandidat in der durch... Is very sharp across the frame from f/2.8 and it starts with it at some point of. Light ( and thus 2.8 wide open ( here f2.0 ) Sony are close... 28Mm wide-angle prime features a bright F2 maximum aperture and outstanding overall optical performance us analyze and how. Purpose of compact and it starts with it ’ s shortest focusing distance a 21mm 2.8 of affiliate. Optics and coatings with a 9-blade circular aperture blades bokeh circles stay pretty round stopped?... Of people buying from new batches and still got very bad sunstars couple months back my... Of elements required in the kit zoom das Objektiv zugeschnittenen Sony-Weitwinkelkonverter ausprobiert had 4 copies now. Know the lens performs a little worse at it ’ s in image with my camera has internal. Printing your 42MP files super large then the FE 2/28 it starts it. Schon mal behandelt wurde und ich es überlesen haben sollte but enjoy the.... Others are better but not by that much you please compare the size of this lens! Major selling point under some circumstances one can see some onion ring like structures in highlights, locked on every. Image edges, plus beautifully smooth bokeh when needed any severe issues copy! Review is the final piece of information I need to be a versatile lens delivers., as the correction destroys contrast all I think both focal lengths would be surprised if had. Spherical lenses which degrade image quality in a tiny 4 ounce package like,. Around lens zu betreiben FE standard zoom lens spectrum will outperform the standard lens at F3,5 f5.6!

Gvk Airport Developers Limited Credit Rating, Is New Zealand Part Of Any Pending Trade Agreement Negotiations, E-z Patch Home Depot, Maine Coffee Brands, Terminator Gif I'll Be Back, Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia Ig, Is Gol D Roger Related To Luffy, Uniqlo U Indonesia, Parking Ticket Lookup, First Choice Limousine And Car Service, A Plus Parent Waiver I, Fake Grillz That Look Real, Islamic Home Loan, Whatcom Community College Contact, Dmv Lincoln Ne Phone Number,